Cathars and Cathar Beliefs in the Languedoc
Interogation of Aude, Wife of Guillaume Fauré, of Merviel




Basic Tenets


Cathar Believers

Cathar Elect

Afterlife, Heaven & Hell

Other Beliefs

Cathar Ceremonies

Cathar Prayer

The Cathar Hierarchy



Albigensian Crusade

Who led the Crusade ?

Crusader Coats of Arms

Defender Coats of arms

Medieval Warfare






Cathars on Catholics

Catholics on Cathars

Catholic Propaganda

"Kill Them All ... "






Inquisition documents



Cathar Castles

Cathar Castle Photos



Early Gnostic Dualism





Historical Studies

Popular Culture

Catholic Inheritance

Protestant Inheritance

Cathar Vindications

Do Cathars still exist ?





The Catholic Side

The "Cathar" Side

Counts of Toulouse

The Cross of Toulouse



Detailed Chronology





A Cathar Glossary

Source Documents: Interogation of Aude, Wife of Guillaume Fauré, of Merviel


On July 15, 1318, a twenty-six-year-old laywoman named Aude Faure was called before the Inquisition tribunal at the diocesan seat of Pamiers in the County of Foix, and immediately confessed to having temporarily doubted both the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist and the transubstantiation of bread and wine into Christ's body and blood; her doubt, she explained, had been cured by intervention from the Blessed Virgin.

Less than a month later, Aude abjured her errors by the usual formula and was sentenced to a series of pilgrimages and fasts over the next three years. Aude's multiple confessions, along with depositions from her family, friends, and neighbours, take up a mere six folio pages in the Register kept by Bishop Jacques Fournier, head of the Pamiers tribunal, and preserved in the Vatican Library after Fournier became Pope Benedict XII.

Aude seems to have been an ordinary woman with ordinary beliefs - including scepticism about the then century-old doctrine of transubstantiation. Such scepticism had become a capital crime, so we have no idea about whether Aude really changed her mind, or simply said what she hoped would save her life. If a stated disbelief in unicorns were sufficient cause for a death sentence, then we might expect the majority of people to be willing to avow a belief in unicorns. The prospect of being burned alive would be a strong incentive to convince authorities that one really did really, genuinely completely believe in unicorns. So it was with Catholic doctrine in Pamiers in 1318, including the doctrine of transubstantiation. Most rational people in Aude's circumstances would announce their sudden acceptance of the doctrine, and might well make up a divine vision to help bolster it. Inquisitors burned women like Aude for expressing continued doubts about Catholic doctrine. Her only chance was to renounce her doubts, and she might well have gambled that a divine vision might help tip the balance in her favour - for a bishop a vision was the best possible reason for her to change her mind. We have no idea how many people privately rejected and riduculed this Catholic doctrine in 1318 - the proportion might have been much the same as it now, but we will never know because they valued their lives.

Aude's case has prompted a number of mentions in religious and quasi-historiographic works, and these mentions are striking for their ideas about Aude's doubt and miraculous vision. They do not seriously consider the possibility that Aude might be putting on an act in order to save her life. Instead she has been diagnosed as hypersensitive, neurotic, masochistic, morbid, hysterical, obsessive, afflicted with atheism, prone to fantasy, tormented by guilt, suffering from postnatal depression, and simply deviant - all views that sit comfortably with a Catholic viewpoint. At the time of writing, only Peter Biller, has suggested that Aude's case should be considered as an example of the "wide range of theological doctrine, simply and clearly held, [which] was common currency" among common people at that time and in that place.






Year of our Lord 1318, the Saturday before the holiday of Saint Mary Magdalene (July 15th 1318). As it reached the knowledge of Revered Father in Christ My Lord Jacques, Bishop of Pamiers by divine Providence, that Aude, the daughter of the late Guillaume de Maucasal, of Lafage in the diocese of Mirepoix , and the spouse of Guillaume Fauré of Merviel, in the diocese of Pamiers, was suspected of heresy, and even strongly so, by reason of certain words and declarations uttered, as it has been said, by her in the presence of certain people against the Catholic Faith, and that moreover, as it has been said, this Aude was publicly slandered, My Said Lord Bishop, wishing thus to take the responsibility of investigating into the truth of these events with the said Aude and others, had her brought into his presence, wishing, as he has said, to investigate with her into the truth of these above-mentioned accusations.


My said Lord Bishop, having summoned the venerable and discrete persons My Lord Pierre du Verdier, Archdeacon of Majorque; master Hugues de Bilhères, appellate Judge of Pamiers; master Guillaume de Saint-Julien, jurist of Pamiers; master Bernard Gaubert, jurist of the diocese of Narbonne; and Guillaume de Pardailhan, public apostolic notary, to assist him in this investigation, physically swearing them in, ordered them under the faith of the oath in virtue of holy obedience to keep the secrets of this investigation and to bring him help and council, all things which they promised to do according to the conventions of law hereabove.


After which My Said Lord Bishop requested one day the said Aude in the name of simple information if she had fallen into error on the articles of faith and the sacraments of the Church, and on which of them, as it had been reported to My Lord the Bishop. She responded immediately1:


I believe that our Lord Jesus Christ was born of the flesh of the Holy Virgin Mary, and that he suffered, and was crucified for the human race, that he was resurrected, and ascended to heaven, and that he will return to judge the good people and the bad people; I profess and believe the faith and the sacraments as they are observed by the Holy Roman Catholic Church.

Interrogated subsequently, she nevertheless said:  

About eight years ago, I contracted a marriage with Guillaume Fauré, my husband, and I was taken to his house in Merviel around All Saints'. As I had never received the body of the Lord, even though I was 17 or 18, I confessed my sins to a priest, but at the following Easter, I did not receive the Body of Christ. My husband asked me why and reproached me for it. I told him that in Lafage, where I am from originally, young men and women did not usually receive the body of Christ.


Then, the following year, again on Easter Day, I received the body of Christ. And as I had omitted to confess a serious sin that I had committed before marrying my said husband, I was completely terrified and upset because I had received the body of Christ without having confessed this sin.


Finally, after the following three years had gone by, I fell into the following error: I did believe that God was all-powerful in heaven, but I did not believe that God was in the sacrament on the alter, or that by virtue of the holy words spoken by the priest, it became the body of Christ. I was in this error and persisted in it without interruption until now that I have been taken to My Lord Bishop for it2.


In the presence of which she said that the Holy Virgin Mary had inspired her in her heart to again believe that the flesh and the blood of Christ are the in sacrament on the alter, and that she believed that which a good Christian must believe.


Did anyone, man or women, lead you to this error?

No, but it came to me, I believe, from the persistence of the sin I spoke of because I had not confessed it.  
Have you met any of the heretics or spoken with them?  

No, to my knowledge, I have never seen a heretic.

Have you confessed this error to a priest or to anyone else?  

No, until recently, when I was gravely ill. In the grips of that sickness, I revealed this error to Guillaume Fauré, my husband, and to Ermengarde Garaud, of Merviel. And first to my husband in these terms: "Sir, how is it possible that I cannot believe in our Lord!" My husband said to me, scolding me: "What, damn woman, are you saying this in your right mind?" I responded: "Yes." My husband told me then that if I had not confessed, I had better, because otherwise I could not stay with him, and he would send me away.


When you said these words to your husband, were you in your right mind'

Yes, and even now I remember all that very well.  

In this same sickness, I sent for Ermengarde Garaud of Merviel. When she had arrived in my house, I told her: "Osta, tia3, how can it be that I cannot believe in our Lord, and that I cannot believe that the host that is raised on the alter by the priest is the body of Christ?" Then Ermengarde reprimanded me strongly and suggested many things to encourage me to believe, among them, the following example:


"A long time ago, there was a Goodwoman who made a loaf of bread, which was then consecrated by the priest on the alter. This consecrated loaf was then made into the body of Christ. The priest used it to give Communion to the congregation. The woman who had made it began to laugh when she saw this. The priest noticed, and when she approached to receive the Communion, he told her, 'You, stay behind,' and asked her why she had laughed. She responded: 'Sir, the body of Christ can be made out of the loaf that I kneaded! That's what I'm laughing about.' Immediately the priest began to pray with the congregation so that God might work a miracle on it. Once this prayer was done, when he tried to give this consecrated bread to this woman, the consecrated bread that he offered to her for Communion looked like the finger of a child, and the consecrated wine in the Chalice like coagulated blood. Seeing this, the frightened women began to pray. The priest and the congregation did the same. After this prayer, the women was thus converted, believing that the body of Christ was in this sacrament, and this finger and this blood regained their first appearance of bread and wine as before, and this women received Communion devoutly."4

"the consecrated bread that he offered to her for Communion looked like the finger of a child, and the consecrated wine in the Chalice like coagulated blood" - This sort of thing was reported so frequently in Medieval times that people were ready to believe that it not only happened, but was relatively unremarkable

After that story, I said, "O tia, your words are so good, and you have comforted me so much!"  
Have you confessed this error to a priest?  
I don't remember.  

After which, the Monday before the holiday of Saint Mary Magdalene, the 17th of July, 1318, the said Aude appeared in person before My said Lord Bishop in the Episcopal House of Pamiers, in the presence of My said lords Pierre du Verdier, Archdeacon of Majorque; master Barnard Gaubert, and me, Guillaume de Pardailhan, aforementioned notary, the assistants of My said Lord Bishop. The which Aude swore on the Gospel of God, touching it physically with her right hand, to tell the whole and pure truth and to respond truthfully to the questions that she would be posed. Interrogated about all the aforementioned events and about each one separately under oath, she persisted in her previous confession, except for the following corrections and rectifications, to the effect that during the first year that she came to her husband's house, she received the body of the Lord at Easter, and after having received it, she fell immediately, so she says, into the said error, because she had not confessed a serious sin that she had committed before having contracted marriage with her said husband.

And from that moment until last Saturday, she had persisted without interruption in that error. Not long ago, however, so she says, she had abandoned it and firmly believed all the articles of faith and all the sacraments of the Church, these having been explained to her one by one by My said Lord Bishop.  

She also said that she had recently confessed this error in her illness, one month ago, to the priest of the Holy Cross and that he had imposed a certain penance on her; she herself offered, so she says, to accomplish this penance, and even an even bigger one at that; this priest estimated that that penance was too severe, so he imposed a certain gentler penance.

Diligently interrogated, she said nothing more of pertinence.  

After which, the aforementioned Monday, My said Lord Bishop being assisted by the persons previously named, Guillaume Fauré of Merviel in the diocese of Pamiers, the husband of the said Aude, was brought into the presence of My Lord the Bishop and interrogated, after having physically sworn the oath to tell the whole and pure truth about that which precedes, in the principle capacity as well as about the said Aude as witness:

How long ago was it that you contracted marriage with the said Aude?  
It was about seven or eight years ago around last All Saints' day.  
During this time, have you known or believed that your wife was a heretic or a suspect of heresy?  

No, by the oath that I swore. I believe quite the opposite, and I've always believed that she was a good Christian and a good Catholic, until the time of that illness, for I noticed that during this time, among other qualities that she had, she was a great giver of alms, to the point that if I had listened to her, there would not have been anything left in the house, or not much, because she would have given everything in alms for the love of God.


Did she ever reveal to you the error contained in her confession, that she didn't believe that the body of Christ was in the sacrament on the altar?


No, until recently, at least a month ago, around the last Saint John the Baptist day, a day or two before or after, my wife Aude had an illness during which she received the body of Christ. She called me to her before and told me: "By the Virgin Mary, sir, how is this possible? When I'm in church and they raise the body of Christ, I can neither pray to it nor look at it, and when I think about looking at it, a kind of anbegament6 [obstacle] comes before my eyes." When I heard that, I asked her how that had happened to her, and she asked me then if there was anyone else in the room. I told her no. She told me then that she wanted to confess something to me, her husband. I asked her what is was that she wanted to tell me, and she said to me: "By God, sir, since the first time I communed and received the body of Christ, since our marriage, because of a sin that I had committed the year before I married you, a sin that I never confessed before receiving the body of Christ, I have not believed that the Lord could forgive my sin or help me." At these words, I was afraid, as it were, and I told her: "What is this? Are you speaking in your right mind?" She responded yes, and I told her: "A curse on you, you are lost! The devils will take you away, body and soul, and I, I'll send you away, if you are what you say. Confess quickly!" She responded that she was ready to do so, and I had a priest come for her, to whom she confessed, and she stayed with him a long time.


Why didn't you denounce this talk to My Lord the Bishop or to the Inquisitor?

Because I believed that, when she made these remarks, she was out of her senses because of the illness that she had come down with. Because in this sickness she had said a lot of senseless and horrifying things, like a raving man or woman; and also because I had sent for a priest, to whom I believed that Aude had confessed this sin. For these reasons, I felt I was excused and without reproach.

Do you know if, or have you heard that, Aude has revealed these words or this error to anyone else?  
No, except for what I have just testified.  
Are you aware if anyone, man or woman, led Aude to this error?  

Have you heard or do you know if the parents of the said Aude were suspected of any heresy?



Do you know if or have you heard that the said Aude had in friendship, association, or liaison with one or more persons suspected of heresy?


Do you yourself have, or have you ever had, any doubts about the articles of faith or the sacraments of the Church?

No, quite the opposite, I believed them as our holy mother the Church observes them.  
Have you seen any heretic, or have you been linked to any heretic, or had a friendship with one?  

Next, the same Monday, My Lord the Bishop being assisted by the same, to supplement the inquiry and the obtaining of the truth on that which precedes, he had Ermengarde Garaud of Merviel brought before him, who swore on the Gospel of God physically touching it with her right hand to tell the pure and entire truth on that which precedes, in the principle capacity and as witness. She said and testified as follows:


That year, around the last day of Saint John the Baptist, I do not remember the day, Aude was very ill in her husband's house in Merviel. She sent someone to find me. When I arrived near her, she asked me if there was anyone else in the room. I told her there was not. She told me then that she wanted to confess something to me; I asked her what it was that she wanted to tell me, and she said: "Tia, how can it be that I cannot believe in God, and that when the body of Christ is raised on the alter, I can neither pray to it nor believe that it is the body of Christ?" I responded to her: "Co, na traytoressa no sia7, for this country and this house have always been pure from all evil and all heresy. Take care to not bring it from elsewhere and spoil our country." Aude said to me then: "Tia, what might I do to believe in God, and to believe that the body of Christ is really on the alter, when the priest performs the Elevation of the Host?"


I told her to believe strongly that the Lord and the body of Christ were really above the alter when the priest performs the Elevation, after he speaks the words prescribed by the Lord, and that she mustn't doubt it in the least. Otherwise she would be lost.


Later, she asked me again: "Tia, how do you pray to God, and what words do you say during the Elevation of the body of Christ, when the priest raises it above the alter?" I told her: "Personally, here is how I pray to God, and the prayer that I say: 'Senher, veray Dieus e veray hom, tot poderos, que naquestz del cors de la verges Maria ses tot peccat, e presetz mort e passio sus l'aybre de la veray crostz e fosz per las mas e pels pes clavelatz e per le cap de espinas coronat, e pel costat de lansa nafrat, don esshic sanc e ayga, don tostz em rezemitz de peccat, Senher, trametestz me una lagrema de aquela vostra ayga que lave le mieu cor de tota legesa e de tot peccat8. Into your hands, Lord, I commend my spirit; You have redeemed me, the one true Lord God.'"


Aude told me again: "Tia, what words do you say, in the morning when you get out of bed?" I told her that I said the prayer: "Senher Dieus tot poderos, a vos coma l'arma e'l cors; Senher, vos me gardastz de peccar e de falhar e de l'autra peccada, e de la mieua meteysha e de fals testimoni, e m'amenastz a bona fi9." After which Aude said : "Osta, tia, ta be m'avestz coffortada10! You have such good words and you know how to pray to God so well! Without you, I was lost, and if I were to die, my body would rot in the Church of Saint Christopher11, and devils would take away my soul." At that I repeated to her again: "Na traytoressa, take care to believe strongly in God, and believe that the body of Christ is in the sacrament on the alter, and listen to the example that I am going to tell you.


(And she recounted the example placed above in the confession of Aude.)

And, continuing:  

Then Aude began to strike her face with her hands and cried; she told me and asked me, for the love of God, to come see her often to comfort her.


As a result of the terror that I felt when she revealed her error to me, I fell very seriously ill and I still am at the present time; during that illness, I revealed what she had told me to a priest, My Lord Guillaume of the Infirmary, to clear my conscience, and so that no one could reproach me in anyway. I believe that it was this priest who revealed me to My Lord Bishop.

(Interrogated about herself, she said:)  
I strongly believe in all the articles of faith and sacraments of the Church as the Holy Church of God keeps and observes them. Never have I seen or heard any heretic or any suspect against the faith, nor have I frequented any of them.  
Have you given this deposition for favor, affection, hatred, or fear?  
No, only because it is the truth.  
Are you a relative of Aude?  


And she said nothing more of any pertinence.  

After which, the Tuesday before the holiday of Saint Mary Magdalene (the 18th of July), My said Lord Bishop, wishing to investigate more fully into the truth of the preceding events, wrote to My Lord Guillaume of the Infirmary, priest, a patented letter in the following terms:


"Brother Jacques, by divine commiseration Bishop of Pamiers, to our dear priest in Christ Guillaume of the Infirmary, salvation in our Lord Jesus-Christ.


We firmly instruct you to appear before us in person tomorrow at the hour of prime in our Episcopal seat of Pamiers in the proceedings of the inquisition of the heretical deviation opened against Aude, wife of Guillaume Fauré, of Merviel, to give testimony of the truth, and to moreover summon those who seem to you to be possible witnesses in this proceeding, so that they may bring testimony of the truth on the same day at the same hour.


Dictated at the above said seat, the Tuesday before the holiday of the blest Mary Magdalene, the year of our Lord 1318. This letter to be returned."


On the day indicated in the letter, the Wednesday before the holiday of Saint Mary Magdalene, My said Lord Bishop, attended by My Lord Archbishop of Majorque; by master Hugues of Bilhères; and by Bernard Gaubert, priest, wishing to pursue his enquiry regarding the events that precede, received as witnesses My Lord Guillaume of the Infirmary, priest of the diocese of Pamiers hereabove named in this letter; master Geoffroy Escribe, residing at Ventenac; Bernard de Quié of Merviel; Jean de Monteventoux, of the said place; and Jean Garaud of Merviel, who swore on the Holy Gospel to tell the pure and simple truth regarding the events that precede, and they testified as it is recorded below in their depositions.

My Lord Guillaume of the Infirmary, priest of the diocese of Pamiers, witness sworn and required to tell the truth:  

Ermengarde Garaud came to confess to me her sins in her sickness in my capacity as the vicar of Merviel; last Thursday morning I went to see her to tell her that she must rejoice in having fully confessed her sins and having soothing her conscience; and that thus, since she had done it, she might consider if it would not be best for the salvation of her soul to make a declaration in the presence of some other people who would hear her. She agreed. Immediately, with her agreement, I called master Geoffroy Escribe, Bernard de Quié, Jean de Montventoux, and Jean Garaud, the son of this Ermengarde. When they had entered the house and were in the room where she was lying, sick, she told them to promise in my hands to never reveal to anyone without my consent what she was about to say, which they did. And she said then that Aude, having fallen ill, had send for her one day, that she had gone to her, and that Aude told her: "Tia, do you believe that the host that the priest raises above the altar is the body of Christ?" Ermengarde said and responded yes, she did, strongly, adding, "Co, na traytoressa, don't you believe it?" Aude responded that she could not believe and that she did not believe that this host, when it is raised by the priest, was the body of Christ. Then Ermengarde told her: "You are lost if you do not become a believer in the Lord and do not confess quickly." And, she said, she cried then before the said Aude: "Via fora, a foc, a foc!12"

Where were you when you heard Ermengarde say this?  
In her house in Merviel.  
What day was it?  
Last Thursday.  
At what time?  
In the morning before prime13.  
Who was present?  
The said Ermengarde, myself, and the four witnesses above named, whom I had called. No one else.  
Diligently interrogated, he said nothing more of pertinence.  
Master Geoffroy Escribe, inhabitant of Ventenac, witness sworn and carefully required to tell the truth regarding the events that precede, declared:  

Last Thursday, in the morning before prime, I was called by My Lord Guillaume of the Infirmary, priest, vicar of Merviel, who told me to come to the house of Ermengarde Garaud of the said place. After coming there and entering the house, I saw that Ermengarde lying sick in her bed.


This priest then, in the presence of Bernard de Quié, Jean de Montventoux, and Jean Garaud, the son of the said Ermengarde, said to this woman that she must greatly rejoice in having confessed, and that if she had something to say, she should unburden herself. The said Ermengarde said then to this priest that she feared that those who were there would reveal what she would say. The priest told me then, as well as the others above named to promise in his hands by our faith to not reveal without his consent that which the said Ermengarde would say. We did this, myself and the three others.


This done, Ermengarde said that recently, around the last holiday of the birth of Saint John the Baptist, Aude, the wife of Guillaume Fauré of Merviel send for her one day, and that then she, Ermengarde, came to the house of Guillaume Fauré, where that Aude was lying, sick, in bed, in a bedroom. Aude told her then: "O tia, what am I to do? I cannot believe that when the priest, at mass, raises the host above the altar, the body of Christ is inside it." Then the said Ermengarde began to shout, "Via fora, via fora!" and said to the said Aude: "Co, na traytoressa, you are lost, convert to God, believe firmly in God and confess carefully and completely, for otherwise you are lost."

Did the said Ermengarde say anything else?  

No, but when she had said that, we left the house, myself and the others.

Who was present during these events?  
Those who have been named, no one else.  
Where did this take place?  
In the house of this Ermengarde, in Merviel.  
Do you know if or have your heard that the said Ermengarde had been discovered with persons suspected of heresy?  
This Aude, did she have a reputation for being a heretic in Merviel, or elsewhere, to your knowledge?  

Not that I know of or have heard tell, until the time of her arrest, that's to say, six days ago. Since then I have heard in Ventenac and Merviel that she had been arrested and locked up in the prisons of My Lord Bishop because she had been reputed a suspect of the faith.


Do you know if or have you heard that any heretics or any suspects of the faith have ever gathered in the house in of the parents of the said Aude in Lafage?


Do you know if or have you heard that Guillaume Fauré, her husband, was a heretic or had met with heretics or suspects of the faith?


Have you thus testified for favor, affection, hate, or fear; have you been corrupted, suborned, or indoctrinated'

Diligently interrogated, he said nothing more of pertinence  

Bernard de Quié, of Merviel…(identical deposition and interrogation, Ermengarde cried:

"A foc, a foc!")14.


Jean de Montventoux, de Merviel…(identical deposition and interrogation: Ermengarde said:

"Co, na traytoressa, heu cridare a foc! »)14 15.


Jean Garaud, son of Ermengarde Garaud of Merviel…(identical deposition and interrogation. Ermengarde said :

"I am going to cry fire, via fora, by God, you are dead and lost !…")14

After which, the Friday before the holiday of Saint Mary Magdalene (the 21 of July), My said Lord Bishop, to supplement the investigation of Aude regarding that which precedes, had her brought before him, attended by My Lord the Archbishop of Majorque; by master Hugues de Bilhères; and I, Guillaume de Pardailhan, notary. Under the faith of the oath by her sworn, she corrected her prior declaration that she had said that she had fallen in this error approximately eight years previously, and that this had come from the thought and the persistence of the sin of which she spoke. She now says that she has been in this error for only approximately four years, and this for a different reason:  

One day, I was going to the Church of the Holy Cross to hear mass, and I heard some women, whose names I no longer remember, saying that the night before a woman had given birth to a girl in the street, inside the walls of Merviel, before she was able to get home. Having heard that, I began to think about the disgusting things that women expel when they give birth, and when I saw the body of the Lord raised above the altar, I thought that it had been defiled by this dirtiness. This is how I fell into this error of belief that the body of Christ was not there.





[some notes were not available in the annotated copy used in transcription]

6. anbegament = obstacle; impediment; snag; hitch


Translation by Dareth Pray, San José State University, 2006 - to whom many thanks for permission to reproduce this text.













Below is an academic paper that discusses Aude's case - without any serious consideration that her new found faith in transubstantiation might be no more than an understandable play-act by an intelligent woman, keen to save her life.

Wendy Love Anderson (2006). The Real Presence of Mary: Eucharistic Disbelief and the Limits of Orthodoxy in Fourteenth-Century France. Church History, 75, pp 748-767 doi:10.1017/S0009640700111825

The real presence of Mary: eucharistic disbelief and the limits of orthodoxy in fourteenth-century France (1).

On July 15, 1318, a twenty-six-year-old laywoman named Aude Faure was called before the Inquisition tribunal at the diocesan seat of Pamiers in southern France and immediately confessed to having temporarily doubted both the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist and the transubstantiation of bread and wine into Christ's body and blood; her doubt, she explained, had been cured by intervention from the Blessed Virgin. (2) Less than a month later, Aude abjured her errors by the usual formula and was sentenced to a series of pilgrimages and fasts stretching over the next three years. Aude's multiple confessions, along with depositions from her family, friends, and neighbors, take up a mere six folio pages in the famously detailed Register kept by Bishop Jacques Fournier, head of the Pamiers tribunal, and preserved in the Vatican Library after Fournier became Pope Benedict XII. This relatively quick-moving and insignificant case seems unrelated to the best-known activity of Fournier's tribunal, namely, the extinction of the last vestiges of Occitan Catharism. Yet Aude's case has gleaned several mentions in recent historiographic works, and these mentions are striking for their focus on the protagonist's psyche: she has been variously diagnosed as hypersensitive, neurotic, masochistic, morbid, hysterical, obsessive, afflicted with atheism, prone to fantasy, tormented by guilt, suffering from postpartum depression, and simply deviant. (3) Any efforts at placing the case within either an historical or a theological context have been extremely limited, with passing observations comparing Aude to her famous mystical contemporaries Angela of Foligno and Marguerite Porete, situating her errors within the context of "unsettling reflection[s]" on Christ's assumption of Mary's flesh, or cataloging her case among other "fantasies" at the margins of orthodox thought about the Eucharist. (4) Only one scholar, Peter Biller, has suggested briefly that Aude's case should be considered as an example of the "wide range of theological doctrine, simply and clearly held, [which] was common currency" among equally common people at a certain time and place. (5)

The following essay will treat Aude's case from the perspective of the history of Christian spirituality and belief rather than the annals of abnormal psychology. As we shall see, Aude's dossier depicts a woman living in a climate of common interest in and expression of the ramifications of Christ's humanity. Like contemporaries ranging from Parisian schoolmen to the final generations of Cathar heretics, she had trouble reconciling her knowledge of human biology with the eucharistic doctrines codified by the Fourth Lateran Council a century earlier. But Aude's dilemma, as produced in her dossier, was ultimately resolved by a devotional appeal to the Virgin Mary, which evoked the growing late medieval interest in Mary's own conception and her role in producing the eucharistic body of Christ as well as the long-standing history of Marian intercession or miracles to demonstrate Christian orthodoxy. Far from being another example of medieval grotesquerie or even a specialized instance of doctrinal deviation, Aude's case highlights a loosely organized community of otherwise unremarkable laypeople performing relatively sophisticated mental operations in order to integrate doctrinal tensions and ongoing debates about eucharistic theology into their devotional lives. It emphasizes the elasticity of orthodox Christian belief in a time and place most famous for the persecution of heresy and depicts the complexity of late medieval Marian devotion as it intersected with both eucharistic controversy and definitions of orthodoxy. Finally, it suggests areas of overlap between Inquisitorially constructed texts and individual expressions of spirituality where historians of Christianity (medieval or otherwise) might fruitfully search for new ideas.


No doubt scholars have been slow to recognize the fundamentally theological nature of Aude's dilemma in part because of the difficulties posed by the source text. It is a record of testimony both translated (from Occitan into Latin, with the exception of a few phrases left in the vernacular) and coerced (at least implicitly). Obviously, it must be treated with immense caution, especially in view of the tendency of southern French Inquisitorial documents to reduce most situations to binaries of orthodoxy/heresy or belief/disbelief even as they seem to offer glimpses into otherwise undocumented areas of lay spirituality. (6) Treating this particular document as a transparent, univocal account would be impossible in any case: even a surface look at the dossier indicates that the accused offered at least two separate (and seemingly unrelated) accounts to explain how she fell into the Inquisitorial categories of "error" and "disbelief." The first version appears to be the one Aude told her husband and (in part) an in-law, or at any rate their testimony confirms it; the second version, which only came out after a week of questioning, is partially confirmed by testimony from four other women and is the one that ultimately satisfied the Inquisitors. What the two versions have in common is their precise statement of Aude's main error--disbelief in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist--and her seemingly unverifiable claim that the Virgin was responsible for ending this disbelief. While both versions of Aude's story were necessarily constructed by some combination of the witnesses, the Inquisitors, and the translation process, it is extremely helpful to compare and contrast the two (intersecting) narratives of orthodox disbelief within Aude's dossier.

Aude's first version of her fall into and deliverance from disbelief seems to be not merely constructed but tailored to an Inquisitorial audience invested in the importance of priestly and episcopal power and their outgrowth in the sacrament of confession. According to her initial confession on July 15th, Aude, daughter of the late Guillaume de Maucasal of Lafage, had married Guillaume Faure of Merviel some eight years earlier. She is identified as a pious Christian, devoid of any known association with heretics, who began her confession of faith by either asserting or repeating after her Inquisitor the belief "that Lord Jesus Christ took flesh from the Blessed Virgin Mary and was born from her" and continuing through a rough paraphrase of the Nicene Creed. (7) However, according to the Inquisitorial text, a serious sin she had committed before her marriage worried her, so that she left this sin out of her Lent confession the following year and avoided Communion at Easter by telling her husband that young people in Lafage were not accustomed to take the Eucharist. The second Easter after her marriage she did receive Communion (for the first time, if we believe her account of Lafage custom), but remained "all terrified and disturbed, because she had received the body of Christ without confessing the said sin." (8) Over the following three years, she then "fell into error," as described in the Inquisitor's text: "Although she believed that God omnipotent was in heaven, nevertheless she did not believe that this God was in the sacrament on the altar, nor that through the holy words which the priest said that there was the body of Christ." (9) She had mentioned her disbelief only to her husband and Ermengarde Garaude, her husband's aunt, (10) during a recent illness. Both Guillaume and Ermengarde had initially demanded to know whether she was in her right mind and had threatened her with expulsion from the Faure household for bringing unorthodox opinions into its midst. Once they were convinced of her good intentions, Ermengarde tried to revive Aude's belief by narrating a pious eucharistic exemplum about a woman who baked the bread [placenta] for the Host and laughed when it was consecrated, only to find herself faced with a child's finger when she took Communion. Meanwhile, Guillaume--the only person to whom Aude had mentioned her unconfessed sin--demanded that his wife confess to a priest at once. However, Aude claimed not to remember whether or not she had actually confessed the sin. (11) She had continued in disbelief, the dossier specified, until she was brought before Bishop Jacques Fournier: "in his presence she said that the Blessed Virgin Mary cast into her heart once again that she believed the sacrament of the altar to be the flesh and blood of Christ. And she believed everything else that a good Christian man or woman ought to believe." (12)

When she was called back to confirm her testimony two days later, Aude clarified that she had fallen into error immediately after she took Communion without a full confession and amended the timing of her first Communion to the first (rather than the second) year after her marriage. However, she said, she had finally confessed her secret sin to a priest from the local church of Saint-Croix during her recent illness. Guillaume and Ermengarde also testified to their parts in Aude's account, confirming her lack of any heretical associations. According to Guillaume's testimony, Aude had told him not only about her unconfessed sin, but had admitted that "when I am in church and the body of Christ is raised, I cannot pray to it nor can I behold it, but when I think to look at it, a certain glare comes before my eyes." (13) After berating his wife, Guillaume told the tribunal, he had immediately gone out and summoned the priest to whom Aude confessed; however, he had not reported her to any authorities because he believed her to be out of her rational mind from illness. (14) Ermengarde also expanded on Aude's account of their conversation, noting that she had reminded Aude that the words of eucharistic consecration were ordained by Christ, and recounting several credal prayers (in a combination of Occitan and Latin), which she herself regularly spoke during the elevation of the Host and upon awakening. (15) Despite these efforts, Ermengarde claimed, Aude remained convinced that her eternal soul was in peril due to her disbelief. After further recriminations from Ermengarde, Aude cut her face with her hands, wept, and asked Ermengarde to pray that the love of God would comfort her. Not long afterwards, Ermengarde concluded, she herself became ill from the fear of this incident and recounted it to the local priest and four convenient witnesses, all of whom in turn affirmed Ermengarde's story.

At this point, the case seemed ready for closure: the sin, whatever it was, had been duly confessed, and Aude had been cured of her disbelief, with all parties vigorously professing their once and future orthodoxy. The story is picture-perfect--almost too perfect--from a doctrinal point of view. Canon 21 of the Fourth Lateran Council, held back in 1215, had mandated annual confession and receipt of Communion (preferably at Easter) as a minimum for all Christians, while enacting harsh penalties against any priest who might break the seal of the confessional; one hundred years later, the tradition of Summae confessorum and the growth of local statues mandating even more frequent confession continued to emphasize the importance of this sacrament. (16) Meanwhile, the famous first canon of Lateran IV had emphasized the connections between Catholic unity, the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, and the apostolic tradition held by the Church's priests and bishops. (17) Over a century later, eucharistic teachings continued to create controversy, but the division of Latin Christendom into an authorized (male) clergy and a laity whose principal responsibilities were making a full confession and maintaining full faith in all the Church's doctrines remained unchanged. Aude had faltered on both counts of lay responsibility, but now--according to the Inquisition's records--she had referred her problems to the proper series of clerical authorities and reaffirmed her allegiance to orthodox belief. The seal of the confessional, which Jacques Fournier respected in other cases, probably accounts for the one remaining gap in testimony, that of the precise nature of Aude's unconfessed sin and the identity of the priest to whom she had finally confessed it. Yet something about this story must have remained unsatisfactory, either to the Inquisitors or to Aude herself, because when Aude was called before the tribunal again on July 21 "to inquire further about the truth of what had been sent forward by the said Aude," she offered a substantially different account of how her "error" came into being. (18)


We have no clear indication of what caused Aude to change her story, since all the details in her initial account lined up perfectly. There is no evidence that she was subjected to or threatened with physical or psychological punishment, but it cannot be ruled out; there is also no ruling out the possibility that one of the witnesses to her second story came forward with some details that Aude had omitted. However, it is equally possible that Aude herself was unsatisfied with her Inquisitorially constructed identity as a confused and inadequately confessed victim of "error" and initiated a second round of testimonies; after all, the sentencing tribunal eventually credited her with having made a "spontaneous confession." (19) Her second story--multiply attested, as we shall see, and accepted by the tribunal as final truth--began from the same set of eucharistic errors as the first, but this time Aude admitted that they did not come from the unconfessed sin "of which mention was made above," although she had indeed failed to confess these events up until her appearance before the tribunal. (20) In the new version, her crisis had begun about four years earlier:

For it [error] touched her, as she says, when on a certain day she went to the church of Saint-Croix in order to hear Mass. She heard from certain women, whose names she says she does not remember, that the previous night a certain woman gave birth to a daughter in the road leading into the town of Merviel, it being so that she could not come to a homestead. Upon hearing this, she thought of the uncleanliness [turpitudinem] (21) which women produce during childbirth, and when she saw the body of our Lord elevated at the altar, she kept thinking about this uncleanliness which had infected the body of the Lord, and because of this she fell into the said error of belief, namely, that the body of our Lord Jesus Christ was not there. (22)

Three days later, on July 24, Aude was called in to confirm her new testimony, and either she or her Inquisitorial amanuensis amended the account to change the moment at which error "touched" her: "this thought of uncleanliness occurred to her [only] when the body of Christ was elevated, and she could not believe that the body of the Lord was there on the altar, nor could she herself pray or contemplate well, since she was impeded by that aforementioned thought and many other thoughts which occurred to her during the said elevation." (23) In any case, according to this new story, Aude's combined experience of recollected childbirth and eucharistic celebration--not her unconfessed sin--had created the spiritual crisis that the Inquisition defined as "error" and diagnosed as "disbelief."

This is, of course, the episode that has given rise to most of the modern attempts to diagnose Aude with psychiatric disorders. From a strictly theological standpoint, however, her train of thought was eminently rational: she had just been reminded of the realities of normal human childbirth, and as an orthodox Christian (the Inquisitorial text reminds us) she believed that Christ had taken flesh from the Virgin Mary. When she saw the Host being transubstantiated into Christ's human body, it occurred to her with new force that Christ must also have been born in the human fashion with its accompanying turpitudo "that women produce during childbirth." It is unclear what Occitan word in Aude's testimony the Inquisitorial scribe might have translated as turpitudo, but the term definitely implies an association of childbirth with something more than simple messiness or unpleasantness, and the emotionally fraught context in which the word turpitudo appears argues that the association was Aude's rather than the scribe's. Aude's crisis may be difficult for contemporary readers to sympathize with, but it is hardly pathological viewed in historical perspective: the connection between childbearing and impurity in Christian thought ultimately dates back to the Hebrew Bible Book of Leviticus, and the connection between female fertility and sin was further attested by then-traditional Christian readings of God's curse upon Eve in Genesis 3:16. (24) At the same time, medieval medical authorities debated whether the blood that nourished the fetus and was expelled along with it was simply retained menstrual blood--a substance that was not merely symbolically and theologically impure, but biologically superfluous and quite literally poisonous to a variety of living creatures--or a boiled, purified version of that same blood. (25) Aude herself had very probably given birth at least once; in any event, it is clear from her testimony that she had witnessed childbirth and was able to paint a vivid mental picture of its aftermath. (26) She would certainly have been familiar with the medical and spiritual associations of childbirth from attending other family births, from sermons, from conversations, from popular stories, or even from the widespread "churching" rituals aimed at purifying women after childbirth.(27) She would also have been familiar with the eucharistic program of Lateran IV, which seemed to set these associations into direct conflict with Catholic orthodoxy.

Indeed, Aude was not the first--much less the only!--medieval Christian to puzzle over how the simultaneously human and divine Christ could be made present in any sense in the all-too-mundane Host. Both Lafage and Merviel were "Catholic" towns, as Ermengarde Garaude's exemplum suggests, but in other parts of Languedoc the Cathar heresy hung on with unexpected (if ultimately doomed) vigor, teaching that Aude's problem could only be solved by cutting the Gordian knot, assuming a completely divine Christ and associating human reproduction (indeed, human bodies) with an evil deity. (28) Nor was Cathar influence necessary to raise doubts in the minds of ordinary Catholics about the miracle of the Eucharist. Villagers in Jacques Fournier's Register who seemed entirely unaffiliated with heretical movements questioned the supernatural and invisible presence of Christ in the Host and repeated the well-worn observation that Christ's body must be the size of a mountain if people were still eating it. (29) Aude herself was never seriously suspected of heresy, either in the strict canonical sense of obstinately held error or in the historical sense of organized dissent from the Church, and her dossier offers no evidence of a naturally skeptical frame of mind. Indeed, Aude's translated vocabulary bespeaks not only Catholic orthodoxy but also a certain theological sophistication when we compare it to other testimonies in Fournier's dossier: while she is credited with identifying the consecrated Host correctly as "the body of our Lord," Le Roy Ladurie has pointed out the extent to which many of Aude's contemporaries, especially those from the lower classes, were recorded referring to the Host simply as "Christ." (30) But even if Aude herself could probably distinguish between Christ-as-God and Christ's body, she still lived in an environment where the two were often elided, and where--as Sarah Beckwith has pointed out in another context--"Christ's body is less the forum for integration and social cohesion than the forum for social conflict, the very arena and medium of social argument." (31) After all, while Guillaume Faur6 had briefly wondered if his wife was temporarily out of her mind, he had also accused her of being "cursed," and his aunt had simply identified her as a "traitoress" who had brought heresy into the family home. (32) No wonder Aude's problem was not so easily diagnosed, by her family or by the Inquisition: it represented one facet of an extremely complex, much-vexed historical discourse about how the sacrament was being adapted or adopted into the lives of fourteenth-century Christians.

The equally strong theological conflict between an orthodox Christology in which Christ was "born of the Virgin Mary" and the Church's teachings about the inherent uncleanliness and sinfulness associated with childbearing--that is, the particular incident that prompted Aude's eucharistic disbelief--was also nothing new. Half a century earlier, in the Summa theologiae, Thomas Aquinas had argued for the distinction between a "purified blood" that sustained the human embryo, and its impure residue, female menstrual blood, for a very specific reason: it lessened the distance across which he had to argue for Christ's completely pure conception.

The menstrual blood, the flow of which is subject to monthly periods, has a certain natural impurity of corruption: like other superfluities, which nature does not heed, and therefore expels. Of such menstrual blood infected with corruption and repudiated by nature, the conception is not formed; but from a certain secretion of the pure blood which by a process of elimination is prepared for conception, being, as it were, more pure and more perfect than the rest of the blood. Nevertheless, it is tainted with the impurity of lust in the conception of other men: inasmuch as by sexual intercourse this blood is drawn to a place apt for conception. This, however, did not take place in Christ's conception: because this blood was brought together in the Virgin's womb and fashioned into a child by the operation of the Holy Ghost. Therefore is Christ's body said to be "formed of the most chaste and purest blood of the Virgin. (33)

Aquinas did not tackle the issue of Mary's delivery, but over the next centuries his Dominican confreres found themselves spearheading opposition to the increasingly popular notion that Mary herself had been conceived immaculately precisely by emphasizing her participation (however voluntary) in the menstrual cycle: since breast milk was also perceived as deriving from superfluous menstrual blood, they sponsored images of lactating Virgins in churches across Europe. (34) Of course, discussion of the Virgin's puerperal purity was also taking place on a less technical level, as part of a narrative tradition that had existed since at least the second century C.E. and the Protevangelium of James. (35) The fifteenth-century English N-Town Play offers testimony from Mary's (apocryphal) midwife on precisely the point that so bothered Aude:

Here opynly I fele and se:
A fayr chylde of a maydon is born
And nedyth no waschynge as other don:
Ful clene and pure forsoth is he
Withoutyn spoyt or ony polucyon,
His modyr nott hurte of virgynite! (36)

These examples only begin to suggest the extent to which Mary's distinctively female body and her role as Christ's human mother stood at the center of both theological and popular disputations throughout the late Middle Ages. As Rachel Fulton has pointed out in reference to a slightly earlier period, "praying to the Virgin and her crucified Son forced medieval Christians to forge new tools with which to feel." (37)

Nor was Aude's leap from human motherhood to the Host entirely without precedent in the history of Christianity. Up through the twelfth century, Fulton notes, Mary (unlike her son) "was present at the altar only virtually, in the remembrance of the fact that the same body available on the altar had first taken its substance from her own." (38) But even then, and increasingly into the late Middle Ages, connections were inevitably drawn between the Virgin and the Eucharist, since both were powerful symbols of Christ's humanity, and both--often together--had become crucial to an era of devotion to and controversy over the ramifications of that humanity. This symbolic association was reified in popular art and literature: Mary was variously depicted or imagined as the tabernacle, vessel, container, robe, and clothing of Christ. She could also be cast as the celebrant of the Mass, the miller of the eucharistic grain, and the oven in which the Host was baked--this last very much in keeping with Galenic theories of conception in which the mother served only as a source of heat (a literal "oven") for the fetus. (39) And, of course, the figure of Mary holding the infant Christ--sometimes suckling her now demonstrably human son--was both central to and ubiquitous in the new eucharistic altarpieces that emerged in the aftermath of Lateran IV's liturgical reforms. In some of these representations, Mary's lactation became explicitly eucharistic, offering her breast in parallel to a bleeding Christ offering his wound. Indeed, Caroline Walker Bynum has pointed out that Christ's crucified body was itself "feminized" by its leakages of blood/milk and water, making the parallel between the Virgin and the Eucharist even stronger. (40) Bynum also draws attention to assorted mystical visions that link the two concepts: for instance, the German nun Lukardis of Oberweimar (d. 1309), too weak to attend Mass, saw Mary appear with her child and nurse Lukardis in lieu of Communion. (41) An even stronger association between Mary and the eucharistic celebrant appears in the visions of the Austrian beguine Agnes Blannbekin (d. 1315), who envisioned the Virgin touching the Host with one finger and was immediately "given to understand" that "the finger of the Blessed Virgin symbolizes the officiating priest because, as the Blessed Virgin brought the Savior physically into the world and presented him, so does the officiating priest bring him and other sacraments to the people." (42)

Aude was no holy woman, and her case may seem miles away from these contemporary visions in more than geographic terms, but even in her dossier there is one easy association of the Virgin's body and Christ's (similarly fluid) Passion in a eucharistic context. Aude's "aunt," the self-consciously orthodox Ermengarde Garaude, had testified that her own customary prayer at the elevation of the Host ran as follows: "Lord, true God and true man, all-powerful, who was born of the body of the Virgin Mary without any sin.... Lord, whose side was pierced by a lance from which came forth blood and water by which we were redeemed from sins, bring me a tear of your water which washes my heart of all ugliness and of all sin." (43) Here the middle point between Virgin and Eucharist is their common interest in Christ's suffering yet sinless flesh. Throughout Aude's dossier as well as the wider context of late medieval spirituality, then, the Virgin and the Eucharist are linked by their mutual effusion of bodily fluids and their mutual (and miraculous) production of the human body of Christ.

However, Ermengarde's prayer also demonstrates the extent to which both Virgin and Eucharist served as touchstones for Christian orthodoxy, and it is here that the successive stories of Aude's dossier display their clearest signs of doctrinal as well as devotional thoughtfulness. While every possible reading of the Inquisitorial text indicates that Aude was not (in any sense) a heretic, she had--as the scribe repeatedly emphasizes--"erred." As such, she was eligible to take advantage of yet another facet of late medieval Marian spirituality: the Virgin providing evidence (miraculous or otherwise) to bolster orthodoxy and eliminate the doctrinal problem of disbelief, especially on matters pertaining to Christ's incarnate flesh. Some of the best-studied examples of this phenomenon pit Mary against the classically "unbelieving" Jews: in miracle stories dating back as far as the sixth century, Mary intervenes precisely in order to convince Jews of the real presence of her son in the consecrated Host, or occasionally in order to spotlight alleged Jewish perfidy in dealing with the Eucharist for the benefit of local Christians. (44) Equally common are the Marian miracle stories in which the Virgin saves orthodox Christians who have fallen into much more serious "errors" than Aude's: one of the most famous is the Theophilus legend, in which Mary successfully redeems the soul an ambitious cleric had previously sold to the Devil! (45) Closer to Aude, there are numerous examples of Marian devotion being demonstrated, questioned, or denied throughout the other dossiers in Fournier's Register; Kathrin Utz Tremp notes that some of the denials are traceable directly to Cathar concerns about the Incarnation--another case of Inquisitorial "disbelief." (46) Within the discourse of Aude's dossier, then, as well as the larger discourse of late medieval Christendom, it followed that where orthodoxy was questioned and confession (to either priest or Inquisitor) was impossible or simply insufficient, Mary was the appropriate object of prayer and invocation. And so the seemingly gratuitous insertion of Aude's salvation by the Virgin--a feature of her initial story that appeared in the very earliest version of her testimony--became not only theologically central to her newly framed dilemma but practically necessary as a method for demonstrating that Aude's Inquisitorially diagnosed disbelief had indeed been "cured." If the Virgin had truly interceded for her, Aude must now be "orthodox" by Bishop Jacques Fournier's standards as well as by her own.


This is, of course, precisely how Aude's dossier continues its revised narrative. As Aude explained in her testimony of July 24 (reiterated and slightly amended twice more), her husband had hired a nurse during her own recent illness. The nurse, Alazais de Pregolh, became ill in her turn, and she arranged for the Eucharist to be brought her on her sickbed. Aude watched Alazais receive the Host, and after the priest had left, Aude returned to the room where Alazais lay accompanied by two widows from Merviel. (47) When the other women touched Aude's body, she "began to be disturbed and to move herself" (that is, in convulsions). (48) Her later deposition added--perhaps with an eye toward Inquisitorial propriety--that she had cried "Holy Mary, help me!" and then complained of not having confessed properly. (49) At any rate, the widows reassured her that she was known throughout the town for her charity and asked what sin she could possible have committed; Aude told them that she could not believe in God, to which they responded, Holy Mary, what are you saying! Return to God and have hope in him!" (50) After the two women left, Aude returned yet again to her nurse's room and asked Alazais whether she believed that she had received Christ's body. When Aude got an affirmative answer, she asked Alazais: "How can it be that I cannot believe?" Alazais responded: "Lady, return to God and believe constantly that this is the body of Christ." Aude asked the nurse to pray that "God might put in her heart that she would believe," and while the nurse prayed, Guillelma, Aude's maidservant, entered the room. Aude asked her, "Guillelma, put yourself in prayer and ask the Blessed Virgin Mary of Montgauzy to illuminate me so that I may believe in God." When Guillelma began praying to the Virgin of Montgauzy, "suddenly the said Aude became, as she says, illuminated, and she believed constantly in God, and she believes it still as she says it." (51)

Was Mary really the inevitable answer to Aude's dilemma? Aude and her contemporaries were far from naive: many of the relatives, friends, and acquaintances to whom Aude divulged her difficulties initially suspected that she suffered from medical or psychiatric problems, although she was able to convince most of them that she was not ill. (52) Instead, they suggested an array of theological (and occasionally thaumaturgical) solutions: confession, credal prayer, edifying stories, and appeal to higher powers. Contemporary readers familiar with the history of late medieval Christian spirituality can offer additional possibilities: Aude's disbelief could have been cured, as in Ermengarde's exemplum, by a simple vision of Christ's literal body replacing the consecrated Host. She could have confessed to a priest and received doctrinal reassurance about the stainless nature of Christ's nativity with only glancing references to the Virgin Mother. She could, presumably, have gotten involved with some sort of organized or informal community that affirmed her denial of Christ's real presence in the Eucharist. She did none of these things--or, at any rate, she did not choose to share them with the Inquisition. Prayer to Mary was the option upon which both Aude and the Inquisitors seem to have seized, the most appropriate answer for her underlying concern with childbirth-related turpitudo as well as for her ongoing entanglement with Fournier's tribunal.

Whether or not Aude was finally telling the truth, she was certainly telling a truth, at least within the textual boundaries of her dossier. Her new set of witnesses confirmed their parts in the story, and Fournier--a skilled canonist and theologian, advised by a panel of local religious--was certainly convinced by it. The penitential regime to which Aude was sentenced on August 7 makes it clear that Fournier considered her transgression relatively minor and that he credited the Virgin with her return to orthodoxy: Aude was not only to confess to her priest four times a year and report to the bishop or his successor every St. Anthony's Day and every Corpus Christi, but also to fast on bread and water on the vigil of each festival of the Virgin Mary and on every Friday that did not fall on Christmas, a festival of the Virgin Mary, or All Saints for the next three years. (53) During the same three-year span, she was to make one pilgrimage each year to each of three different Marian churches in the region and continue to visit the church of the Virgin of Montgauzy each year. (54) Fournier's sentence also confirms his awareness of Aude's multiple stories. Indeed, an unusual postscript to the sentence states that Guillaume Faure is to be cleared of any wrongdoing, presumably as an acknowledgment that Guillaume had testified in good faith despite the differences in his and his wife's ultimate explanations (or, perhaps, had succeeded in convincing the tribunal that this was the case). (55) Fournier also asserted that the Inquisition would press charges against "aforementioned women" who had committed perjury in Aude's case, possibly false informers against her. (56) Aude herself was decidedly in the clear as regarded the tribunal, which concluded that "now she believes with good heart and faith, just as she asserts, that the body of Christ is not imaginary but truly in the sacrament of the altar." (57)

Of course, the Inquisition--even one as effective as Fournier's--had been outwitted before, and would be again. During the past ninety years of Languedocian inquisitions, those being questioned had made use of strategies as obvious as flight and as subtle as resort to allegory. (58) But if Aude's final story was a fabrication of some sort, it was a remarkably clever and coherent one, buttressed by considerable supporting testimony. The final narrative element that makes the link between Mary and the Eucharist throughout all the stories not only workable but seemingly inevitable, Aude's overhearing of gossip and consequent recollection of the turpitudo of childbirth, seems to have been mentioned only in front of Fournier's tribunal--yet its internal logic makes it the most compelling and comprehensible part of the entire dossier. If it was a reasonable approximation of the truth, on the other hand, why all the other versions? They seem to delineate the various social and discursive communities through which Aude worked to resolve her dilemma. With the local widows, it seems, Aude was extremely (and perhaps understandably) vague, describing her problem in general terms of disbelief in God and failure to confess that. With "Aunt" Ermengarde, an in-law of sorts, and with her servants, Aude admitted her eucharistic disbelief but refused to divulge a source (or, quite possibly, they refused to admit to hearing about it). Only the immediate members of Aude's household--husband, courtesy aunt, and servants--heard about the specifically eucharistic nature of her disbelief, and only the servants--tower-status women outside Aude's husband's family, perhaps not inclined to judge her as readily as Ermengarde had--seem to have been involved with the invocation of Mary to "illuminate" Aude. As for the tale of the "secret sin" leading to eucharistic disbelief, it seems likely that this was either the explanation Aude had offered her husband (and possibly the priest from Saint-Croix whom he had summoned) or Guillaume's own preferred version of events in which he himself took decisive action to help his wife--perhaps around the same time that the women in her community were beseeching Mary to help her. (59) It might even have represented a sort of collaboration between Aude and Guillaume, designed to appeal to a range of male authority figures, including Fournier's tribunal, and carefully tailored to pose as little challenge as possible to orthodoxy.

We can hypothesize, then, that Aude distinguished between her assorted confidants by household ties, social standing, and perhaps gender; insofar as we can deduce from the Inquisitorial text, she may have withheld or embroidered parts of her account to suit each community of interlocutors. But when the entire Inquisitorial text is viewed as a whole, what emerges is a picture of a woman with deep spiritual concerns, lacking in any formal education (as far as we know) but capable of addressing doctrinal dilemmas via a series of relatively sophisticated theological and devotional maneuvers that ultimately met with approval from a panel of trained theologians. We are also left with the awareness that this woman existed within a number of overlapping discursive communities, many of whom immediately recognized the difficulties posed by both orthodox eucharistic doctrine and Inquisitorially defined orthodoxy itself, as well as the usefulness of appeal to Mary's unique status under those circumstances. The Virgin's power transcended both gender and class: while Aude's dilemma may have been created and solved in an all-female and lay environment, the clerically educated Bishop Fournier was apparently able both to evoke it and to appreciate it. And despite the Inquisitorial language of belief and doubt, error and orthodoxy, we can also be certain that Aude and her neighbors understood and acknowledged Mary as a powerful intercessory force with respect to precisely the sort of theological issue--eucharistic orthodoxy--in which the Virgin had become a locus for both conflict and resolution.

Mary's invocation by the Merviel community and her direct involvement in Aude's case indicates the presence of a highly specific and sophisticated current of Marian eucharistic spirituality, one which Aude, her servants, and even Bishop Fournier credited with her cure. Moreover, Mary's invocation in the context of Aude's dossier--the proof that her Catholic orthodoxy was being questioned--reminds us that Marian devotion could also serve as evidence of "right" belief despite considerable evidence of other doubts, fears, and omissions. Taken together, these developments suggest the extent to which a Christian community could draw on the multivalent Virgin to resolve contradictions in not only their understanding of doctrine but also in their experience of belief and disbelief. To argue that Aude's concerns with turpitudo represent a neurotic fantasy, an "obsession," or some other problematic diagnosis is to ignore the theological complexity and social agency involved in the invocation of the Virgin Mary throughout Aude's dossier. Aude's multiple narratives, and the various communities within which her stories were constructed, ultimately test the limits of historical awareness as well as the boundaries of late medieval Christian orthodoxy.



(1.) This article has gone through several stages of revision: I would like to thank Dr. Lucy Pick of the University of Chicago, Dr. James Ginther of Saint Louis University, and the 2002-3 Erasmus Institute Fellows at the University of Notre Dame for comments and suggestions. I would also like to thank my anonymous readers for Church History for their careful and constructive critiques. Any remaining infelicities or errors are, of course, my own.

(2.) Aude's dossier has been edited in Le Registre d'inquisition de Jacques Fournier, eveque de Pamiers (1318-1325), ed. Jean Duvernoy (Toulouse : Edouard Privat, 1965), 2:82-105 (hereinafter "Duvernoy" followed by volume and page numbers).

(3.) Cf. Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie Montaillou, village occitan de 1294 a 1324 (Paris: Gallimard, 1975; corr. ed., 1982), 532-34; Peter Dronke, Women Writers of the Middle Ages: A Critical Study of Texts from Perpetua ([dagger] 203) to Marguerite Porete ([dagger] 1310) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 214-15; and Miri Rubin, Corpus Christi: The Eucharist in Late Medieval Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 342-43.

(4.) These are, respectively, Dronke, Women Writers; Caroline Walker Bynum, Holy Feast, Holy Fast: The Religious Significance of Food to Medieval Women (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987), 266; and Rubin, Corpus Christi.

(5.) Biller, "The Common Woman in the Western Church in the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries," in Women in the Church, ed. W. J. Sheils and Diana Wood (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990), 145.

(6.) My own reading of Aude's dossier has been heavily informed by John Arnold's emphasis on the discursive and textual nature of the increasingly complex fourteenth-century Inquisitorial records, and the resultant "production" of heresy. These concepts are elaborated in Arnold's Inquisition and Power: Catharism and the Confessing Subject in Medieval Languedoc (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001), and Belief and Disbelief in Medieval Europe (London: Hodder Arnold, 2005). In Aude's case, we can see the very conscious "production" of orthodoxy even in a situation relatively far removed from organized heretical movements.

(7.) Ibid., 82: "Auda statim dixit et respondit quod credebat dominum Jhesum Christum carnem suscepisse de Beata Virgine Maria et natum fuisse ex ea, ipsum passum et crucifixum pro genere humano fuisse, et resurrexisse et celos ascendisse, venturum etiam ad iudicandum bonos et malos, et quod profitebatur et credebat fidem et sacramenta prout tenet sancta romana Ecclesia."

(8.) Ibid., 83: "stabat, ut dixit, tota perterrita et turbata, quia receperat corpus Christi sine confessione dicti peccati." Following Duvernoy, I have chosen to render names of persons and places in the vernacular whenever possible. Aude's husband's name is Guillelmus Faber in the Register, and the town in which they lived is Muro Veteri; Aude herself came from the town of Fagia.

(9.) Duvernoy, 2:83: "videlicet quod licet crederet quod Deus omnipotens esset in celis, tamen non credebat quod ille Deus esset in sacramento altaris, nec quod per verba sancta que dicit capellanus, esset ibi corpus Christi."

(10.) Aude addresses Ermengarde as tia, "aunt," in her report of their conversation on 82-83, but Ermengarde testifies that she is not related to Aude on 87. However, both Aude and Ermengarde agree that Ermengarde warned Aude against bringing heresy into their ostal, the (patrilineal) extended-family residence. Since Ermengarde is ideni tified as being from Merviel (like Guillaume, but unlike Aude), she is almost certainly a relative of the Faures and a representative of Aude's in-laws. "Aunt" could be either literal or a courtesy title.

(11.) Duvernoy, 2:82-83.

(12.) Ibid., 83: "in cuius presencia dixit quod de novo Beata Virgo Maria inmiserat in cor suum quod credebat in sacramento altaris esse carnem et sanguinem Christi. Et omnia alia credebat que bonus christianus seu bona christiana debebat credere."

(13.) ibid., 85: "'Nam quando sum in ecclesia et elevatur corpus Christi, non possum orare ipsum nec possum ipsum respicere, set quando puto respicere ipsum, supervenit quoddam anbegament ante occulos.'" Dronke, Women Writers, 273-74, suggests amending Duvernoy's anbegament to essbegament, corresponding to Mid. Provencal esbayment or esbleougissament and Mod. Fr. eblouissement ("glare" or "dazzle").

(14.) Duvernoy, 2:85-86.

(15.) ibid., 87.

(16.) For instance, the 1229 Council of Toulouse had mandated confession three times a year (Easter, Pentecost, and Christmas) for the Christians of southern France; cf. J. D. Mansi, Sacrorum concilorum nova et amplissima collectio (Florence: Antonii Zatta Veneti, 1759-98), 24:197. The Lateran IV canon is number 21, Omnis utriusque sexus. For a brief discussion of how this canon influenced late medieval confessional practices, cf. John Bossy, "The Social History of Confession on the Eve of the Reformation," The Royal Historical Society, 5th ser., 25 (1975): 21-38.

(17.) Lateran IV, Canon 1, De fide catholica.

(18.) Duvernoy, 2:94: "dictus dominus episcopus volens plus inquirere cum dicta Auda veritatem super premissis, fecit dictam Audam coram se adduci."

(19.) Ibid., 103: "confessa fuit spontanea."

(20.) Ibid, 94: "peccati de quo est facta mentio superius," and 98 on her failure to confess her error of disbelief.

(21.) I have chosen to translate turpitudo here as "uncleanliness," although in this context it appears to specifically describe the afterbirth and other emissions associated with a normal delivery. However, this English word fails to convey the sense of pollution that accompanies the Latin. Dronke (cf. above) chooses to translate turpitudo as "disgusting afterbirth." Since this is a pivotal term in Aude's testimony, I will be resorting to the Latin turpitudo at certain points later in this article.

(22.) Duvernoy, 2:94: "contigit enim sibi, ut dixit, quod cum quadam die iret ad ecclesiam Sancte Crucis ad missam audiendam, audivit a quibusdam mulieribus, de quarum nominibus dixit se non recordari, quod nocte precedenti quadam mulier quandam filiam [Duvernoy adds 'pepererat'] in via intus castrum de Muro Veteri, ita quod non potuerat pervenisse ad hospicium, quo audito cogitavit turpitudo quam emittunt mulieres pariendo, et cum videret elevari in altari corpus Domini, habuit cogitationem ex ilia turpitudine quod esset infectum corpus Domini, et quod et [Duvernoy corrects to 'ex'] hoc inicit in dictum errorem credentie videlicit quod non esset ibi corpus Domini Iesu Christi."

(23.) Ibid. (italics mine): "tamen occurrebat sibi illa turpis cogitatio quando elevabatur corpus Christi, et non poterat credere quod corpus Domini esset ibi in altari, nec poterat ipsum rogare nec inspicere bene, inpediente ipsam cogitatione predicta et multis aliis cogitationibus que sibi in dicta elevatione occurrebant."

(24.) Twenty-three of the thirty-two occurrences of turpitudo in the Latin Vulgate come from Leviticus; perhaps the most telling one in this context is Lev. 20:18: "Qui coierit cum muliere in fluxu menstruo et revelaverit turpitudinem eius ipsaque aperuerit fontem sanguinis sui interficientur ambo de medio populi sui." Cf. Charles Wood, "The Doctors' Dilemma: Sin, Salvation, and the Menstrual Cycle in Medieval Thought," Speculum 56 (1981): 713: "By sin not just death entered the world, but also fertile carnality; and in women ... menstruation was both a mark of that sin--the curse of Eve--and the necessary companion of their fertility."

(25.) Often, the distinction between ordinary menstrual blood and its purified form was made precisely because medieval physicians could not imagine that the vulnerable fetus could survive sustained exposure to the former. A tripartite distinction was also possible, in which the menses of pregnant women were divided into a purified portion (which later sustained the child as breastmilk) and a "superfluity" (of an already superfluous substance), which was supremely corrupt and was expelled as afterbirth. Cf. William F. MacLehose, "Nurturing Danger: High Medieval Medicine and the Problem(s) of the Child," in Medieval Mothering, ed. John Carmi Parsons and Bonnie Wheeler (New York: Garland, 1979), 3-8.

(26.) Fournier's dossier tells us that she had been married for eight years, and that (as we shall see) when Aude became ill, her husband hired a nutrix who stayed on after Aude recovered. It is extremely likely that the woman was hired as a wet-nurse for a child of Aude's. It is, however, something of a leap to argue from there that Aude was suffering from postpartum depression, as does Rubin in Corpus Christi, 343-44.

(27.) The extent to which late medieval churching rituals ritually performed and thereby reinforced gender roles has most recently been discussed (using northern French liturgical texts) by Paula M. Rieder, "Insecure Borders: Symbols of Clerical Privilege and Gender Ambiguity in the Liturgy of Churching," in The Material Culture of Sex, Procreation, and Marriage in Premodern Europe, ed. Anne L. McClanan and Karen Rosoff Encarnacion (New York: Palgrave, 2002), 93-113. As Rieder points out, "the churching of women not only communicated pollution but actually produced women polluted by the processes of conception and childbirth .... The frequent repetition of the rite assured that the constructed category of sexual pollution and the image of women, in particular, as the harbingers of that pollution remained constant elements in the medieval discourse on sexuality": 99.

(28.) A good summary of these intertwined principles appears in Malcolm Lambert, The Cathars (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), 161-64.

(29.) Cf. Duvernoy, 1:215 ft., 3:464, and 2:130, among others.

(30.) Le Roy Ladurie, Montaillou., 480, n. 3.

(31.) Beckwith, Christ's Body: Identity, Society, and Culture in Late Medieval Writings (London: Routledge, 1993), 35.

(32.) Cf. above, note 11. Guillaume's comment is on Duvernoy, 83: "Quomodo, maledicta, loqueris in bono sensu tuo?" Ermengarde's is ibid., 87: "Co, na traytoressa no sia, nam iste locus et istud hospitalium semper fuit mundus de tot male nec de yregia!" I thank the Church History reader who brought these conflicting diagnoses to my attention.

(33.) Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae Ilia a.31 q.5. Danielle Jacquart and Claude Thomasset, Sexuality and Medicine in the Middle Ages, trans. Matthew Adamson (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988), 76 77, cite this passage and point out that Aquinas supports the more typical equation of menstrual blood, afterbirth, and female semen in his Sentences commentary; here he is clearly bending as many rules as possible for Mary.

(34.) Cf. Wood, "The Doctors' Dilemma," 718-24.

(35.) Cf. New Testament Apocrypha, 2nd edition, ed. Wilhelm Schneemelcher, English trans. ed. R. McL. Wilson (Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox, 1991), 1:421-39.

(36.) Edited in Stephen Spector, The N-Town Play, 2 vols., Early English Text Society S.S. 11 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 1:160. Recent scholarship on late medieval English mystery plays has pointed out the extent to which many of these dramas create new scenes where Mary's pure, painless, and pollution-free conception and delivery of the infant Jesus can first be doubted and then be attested by witnesses. Cf. Theresa Coletti, "Purity and Danger: The Paradox of Mary's Body and the En-gendering of the Infancy Narrative in the English Mystery Cycles," in Feminist Approaches to the Body in Medieval Literature, ed. Linda Lomperis and Sarah Stanbury (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993), 65-95.

(37.) Rachel Fulton, From Judgment to Passion: Devotion to Christ and the Virgin Mary, 9001200 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002), 197.

(38.) Ibid., 245.

(39.) Cf. Rubin, Corpus Christi, 142-45.

(40.) Bynum, Holy Feast, 102-3. But the Virgin's soothing lactation could also be contrasted to, or explicitly divorced from, her own lower body with its far more disturbing effusions, as Aude's story makes clear. On the "partition" of Mary's body, cf. Dyan Elliot, Fallen Bodies: Pollution, Sexuality, and Demonology in the Middle Ages (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), 114-16.

(41.) Ibid., 131.

(42.) Agnes Blannbekin, Life and Revelations, chap. 42, trans. Ulrike Wiethaus, in Agnes Blannbekin, Viennese Beguine: Life and Revelations (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2002), 40. The original Latin is in Leben und Offenbarungen der Wiener Begine Agnes Blannbekin, ed. P. Dinzelbacher and R. Vogoler (Goppingen: Kummerle, 1994), 128-30.

(43.) Duvernoy, 2:86: "'Senher, veray Dieus e veray horn, tot poderos, que naquestz del corse de la Verges Maria ses tot peccat, e presestz mort e passio sus l'aybre de la veray crstz et fostz per las mas e pels pes clavelastz e per le cap de espinas coronat, e pel costat de lansa nafrat, don esshic sane et ayga, don tostz em rezemitz de peccat, Senher, trametestz me una lagrema de aquela vostra ayga que lave le mieu cor de tota legesa et de tot peccat.'" (The Occitan of this prayer suggests that it is one of the few elements of Aude's dossier which experienced a minimum of Inquisitorial translation.)

(44.) These developments are discussed in more detail by Denise Despres, "Mary of the Eucharist: Cultic Anti-Judaism in Some Fourteenth-century English Devotional Manuscripts," in From Witness to Witchcraft: Jew and Judaism in Medieval Christian Thought, ed. Jeremy Cohen, Wolfenbutteler Mittelalter-Studien 11 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1996); and Miri Rubin, Gentile Tales: The Narrative Assault on Late Medieval Jews (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1999), 7-28.

(45.) For some of the earliest variants of this legend, cf. G. G. Meersseman, Kritische Glossen op de Griekse Theophilus-Legende (7 eeuw) en haar latijnse Vertaling (9 eeuw) (Brussels: Paleis der Academien, 1963).

(46.) Kathrin Utz Tremp, "'Parmi les heretiques': la Vierge Marie dans l'inquisition de l'eveque Jacques Fournier de Pamiers (1317-1326)," in Marie: Le culte de la Vierge dans la societe medievale, ed. Dominique Iogna-Prat, Eric Palazzo, and Daniel Russo (Paris: Beauchesne, 1996), 533-60.

(47.) Aude seems to have been either deliberately vague or confused about the location and timing of this episode, initially thinking it had all taken place at her own house, but later amending her testimony to state that the nurse was staying at one of the widows' houses initially and that the widows came over to Aude's house later on to visit her, whereupon they discovered Aude's distress.

(48.) Duvernoy, 2:95: "dicta Auda incepit turbari et moveri." The nurse Alazais de Pregolh's testimony is slightly more precise about Aude's symptoms: according to her, when the Host was being presented, "incepit molestari et clamari ac expoliari se raubis suis, et tunc dicta Aladaycis et Guillelma, pedisseca dicta hospicii dicte Aude, credentes, ut dixit, quod dicta Auda pateretur tunc morbum caducum Santi Pauli": 100. It seems as though the onlookers thought Aude might be suffering from some form of epilepsy or other convulsive disease.

(49.) Duvernoy, 2:98: "Sancta Maria, succurre michi!" This version makes clear that the unconfessed sin was Aude's disbelief, not the "secret sin" of her earlier confession.

(50.) Ibid., 95: "dicens ad interrogationem dictam duarum mulierum que eandem interro-gabant quare sic turbabatur et movebatur, que dixit quod pro eo quia non poterat credere Deum, que mulieres dixerunt ei: 'Sancta Maria, quid dicitis, revertamini ad Deum et habeatis spem in eo!'"

(51.) Ibid., 95: "Postque cum dicte due mulieres recessissent, ipsa Auda rediit ad cameram ubi iacebat dicta nutrix et dixit sibi: 'Tu recepisti corpus Christi, credis quod illud quod recepisti sit corpus Christi?' que nutrix respondit quod credebat firmiter, cui dixit dicta Auda: 'Quomodo potest esse quod ego non possim credere?' et dicta mulier dixit ei, 'Domina, revertamini ad Deum et credatis firmiter illud esse corpus Christi.' Et dicta Auda dixit dicta nutrici quod rogaret Deum quod poneret in corde suo quod crederet, et dum dicta nutrix, ut melius poterat, rogaret Deum, supervenit Guillelma, ancilla dicti hospicii dicta Aude, cui dixit dicta Auda: 'Guillelma, pone te in orationem et roga Beatam Virginem Mariam de Monte Gaudio ut illuminet me quod ego possim credere Deum.' Quod et fecit dicta Guillelma flexis genibus. Et cum orasset, statim dicta Auda fuit, ut dixit, illuminata, et credidit firmiter in Deum, et credit adhuc prout dixit." The church of Notre-Dame de Montgauzy or Montjoie, an Augustinian priory in the County of Foix, was a major regional pilgrimage site from at least the eleventh century forward; another woman in Fournier's Register made a pilgrimage there to request the return of her stolen property (Duvernoy, 1:192-97), so it seems likely that the Virgin of Montgauzy was also locally renowned as an intercessor. Unfortunately, the church Aude and Guillelma had in mind was destroyed in the late sixteenth century during the Wars of Religion, so we cannot speculate about whether any particular imagery might have made the Virgin of Montgauzy especially receptive to Aude's plight. Cf. Jules de Lahondes, Les eglises des pays de Foix et de Couserans (reprint Nimes: C. Lacour, 2001).

(52.) The only exception, Aude's husband Guillaume, claimed that his continued belief in her temporary insanity was the reason he had failed to inform the Inquisition of her fall into error (cf. above). There is ample reason to suspect an element of self-interest in this diagnosis.

(53.) Duvernoy, 2:103-4. Aude was to confess at Easter, Pentecost, All Saints, and Christmas; as her earlier testimony suggests, the custom in Merviel would have been to confess and receive Communion only at Easter.

(54.) Ibid., 104. The three churches in question were Notre-Dame de Rocamadour, NotreDame du Puy, and Notre-Dame de Vauvert.

(55.) Ibid, 105.

(56.) Ibid.: "Item, retinemus nobis potestatem quod supranominate mulieres que superios in processu periurium commiserunt possimus de dicto periuriu punire, penitencias eisdem iniungendo et alias prout nobis placeurit et visum fuerit faciendum." Aude herself is the only woman in her dossier who seems to have substantially altered her testimony during her trial, and she is certainly the only woman supranominate throughout the sentencing phrase, unless we are to count the Virgin Mary! All the other women who testified in her case seem to have done so truthfully, judging from their conformity to Aude's reports of the same exchanges. I can only suggest that Fournier might have been referring to the one remaining omission in the dossier, the identity of the person or persons who brought Aude's case to the Inquisition's attention in the first place.

(57.) Duvernoy, 2:103: "nunc se meliori consilio usa credit prout asseruit de corde bono et fide non ficta corpus Christi esse vere in sacramento altaris."

(58.) For more on these strategies, cf. Arnold, Inquisition; and James B. Givens, Inquisition and Medieval Society: Power, Discipline, and Resistance in Languedoc (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997), 93-110.

(59.) On the differences between men's and women's--and especially husbands' and wives'--versions of miracle stories, often focusing on who had invoked the crucial saint first, best, or most often, cf. the discussion in Laura Smoller, "Miracle, Memory, and Meaning in the Canonization of Vincent Ferrer, 1453-1454," Speculum 73 (1988): esp. 437-40.



















You can join small exclusive guided tours of Cathar Castles
led by an English speaking expert on the Cathars
who lives in the Languedoc
(author of and )

Selected Cathar Castles. Accommodation provided. Transport Provided.

Cathar Origins, History, Theology.
The Crusade, The Inquisition, and Consequences

Click here to visit the Cathar Country Website for more information

Around 1250 Alphonse de Poitiers wrote to Pope Innocent IV asking him to issue a bull against heresy. This document is known in the form of a draft, on the back of which is a sketch showing a man being burned at the stake.


Alphonse's draft letter is held in the French National Archives, in a dossier called "Grands documents de l'histoire de France; Florilège", No notice 00000192, Fonds MUS, Cote AE/II/257 (Cote origine J428/1): described as "Projet de texte rédigé pour Alphonse de Poitiers, comte de Toulouse, afin d'obtenir du pape Innocent IV une bulle sur les poursuites contre les hérétiques. Au verso figure le dessin d'un hérétique livré aux flammes. Document non daté, en latin."


Franciscans watching a Cathar Consolamentum


Jean-Paul Laurens (1838-1921)
La Délivrance Des emmurés de Carcassonne, 1879
oil on canvas ( 115 cm c 150 cm)
Musée Des Beaux Arts, Carcassonne, France


Trencavel seal reproduced in stone in Béziers


Road sign commemorating a Cathar Council at Pieusse

road sign in Pieusse, Aude

Carcassonne - Château Comtal


Villerouge Termenes - staircase built within the thickness of a tower wall


Medieval window seat at Villerouge Termenes where the last known Cathar Parfait in the Languedoc was burned alive for disagreeing with Catholic theology.


Montsegur where around 325 Cathars were burned alive for disagreeing with Catholic theology

The famous castle at Montsegur

Saint Augustine of Hippo - an ex Manichaean
Sometimes called the "Father of the Inquisition"


Donjon d'Arques


Capitol, Toulouse


Commemorative plaque at Lavaur where around 400 Cathars were burned alive for disagreeing with Catholic theology.


Cistercian Abbey of Fontfroide


Pope Innocent III with Raymond VII, Count of Toulouse


Memorial at Les Casses where 60 Cathars were burned alive


Franciscan Friars witness a Cathar Consolamentum


Figure on the Basilica at Carcassonne


The King of Aragon wearing his "Coat of arms"


Cité of Carcassonne


Auto Da Fe Presided Over by Saint Dominic de Guzmán (1475); Pedro Berruguete (around 1450-1504) commissioned by Torquemada, Oil on wood . 60 5/8 x 36 1/4 (154 x 92 cm).
Now in the Museo del Prado, Madrid.
detail - Cathars to be burned


Burning Cathar "heretics" at Montsegùr


Road sign in Béziers


Jean-Paul Laurens (1838-1921)
The Agitator of La
nguedoc, 1882
oil on canvas ( 115 cm c 150 cm)
Musée Des Augustins, Toulouse, France

(depicting the Franciscan Bernard de Delicieus facing the Inquisition)


Cathars and Catholics Expelled from Carcassonne




Tours of Cathar Castles & Cathar Country


Memorial at Minerve where 140 - 180 Cathars were burned alive for disagreeing with Catholic theology.


Villerouge Termenes where the last known Cathar Parfait in the Languedoc was burned alive for disagreeing with Catholic theology.


Barbican, Aude Gate, Carcassonne

The Chateau Comptal at Carcassonne

Donjon d'Arques




Commemorative plaque at Lavaur where around 400 Cathars were burned alive for disagreeing with Catholic theology.


"Kill them all. God will know his own"


Painting in the Halle des Illustres at Toulouse depicting the death of Simon de Montfort


Figure on the Basilica at Carcassonne


MedievalTrebuchet stones (at Carcassonne)


The King of France wearing his "Coat of Arms"


Raymond VII, Count of Toulouse
submitting to the The King of France


Auto Da Fe Presided Over By Saint Dominic de Guzmán (1475); Pedro Berruguete (around 1450-1504) commissioned by Torquemada, Oil on wood . 60 5/8 x 36 1/4 (154 x 92 cm).
Now in the Museo del Prado, Madrid.
detail - Cathars being burned


Saint Augustine of Hippo, an ex Manichaean, trampling other Manichaeans underfoot


Dominic Guzmán (with a halo), Arnaud Amaury, and other Cistercian abbots crush helpless Cathars underfoot - a sanitised version of the persecution of the Cathars

road sign in Camon, Ariege







Barbican, Aude Gate, Carcassonne


Eastern Manichaeans


Saint Dominic [Dominic Guzmán] and the Albigenses, 1480, Pedro Berruguete (Museo del Prado).


Raymond IV, Count of Toulouse


Nicola Pisano, Cathar "heretics" before Dominic Guzmán at the (fictitious) Dispute of Fanjeaux


Commemorative Road Sign at Minerve where 140 - 180 Cathars were burned alive for disagreeing with Catholic theology.

road sign in Minerve

Béziers where the Abbot-Comander Arnaud Amaury reported killing 20,000 without regard to age, sex or rank.

Flags in Béziers


Figure on the Basilica at Carcassonne


Road sign in Béziers


The Count of Toulouse wearing his "Coat of arms"


A modern recreation of the Cathar Ceremoniy of the Consolamentum





Further Information on Cathars and Cathar Castles



If you want to cite this website in a book or academic paper, you will need the following information:

Author: James McDonald MA, MSc.
Title: Cathars and Cathar Beliefs in the Languedoc
Date last modified: 8 February 2017


If you want to link to this site please see How to link to


For media enquiries please e-mail




Click here to find out about Langudoc Heraldry


 The Cross of Toulouse. Click to see information about it.


   ::::   Link to   :::    © C&MH 2010-2016   :::   :::   Advertising   :::